↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
34 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence A Meta-Analysis
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.02.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashish Shukla, Anthony Aizer, Douglas Holmes, Steven Fowler, David S. Park, Scott Bernstein, Neil Bernstein, Larry Chinitz

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the cumulative effect of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. OSA is a known predictor for onset and recurrence of AF. The effect of treatment with CPAP on AF recurrence has been evaluated in small studies with varied outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Trials Register for relevant studies. Evaluation of AF recurrence in CPAP users and nonusers in patients with OSA was the primary outcome evaluated in this study. The secondary outcome was evaluation of AF recurrence in CPAP users and nonusers after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Seven prospective cohort studies with a total of 1,087 patients met the inclusion criteria. Across all patient groups, the use of CPAP was associated with a significant reduction in AF recurrence (relative risk: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.51 to 0.67; heterogeneity chi-square p = 0.91, I2 = 0%). The beneficial effect of CPAP use was statistically significant in both groups of patients: those who underwent catheter ablation with PVI and those who did not undergo ablation and were managed medically. No other study covariates had any significant association with these outcomes of AF reduction. The use of CPAP is associated with significant reduction in recurrence of AF in patients with OSA. This effect remains consistent and similar across patient populations irrespective of whether they undergo PVI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Other 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#612,116
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#71
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,173
of 279,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.