| Title |
Landscape Development During a Glacial Cycle: Modeling Ecosystems from the Past into the Future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-013-0407-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tobias Lindborg, Lars Brydsten, Gustav Sohlenius, Mårten Strömgren, Eva Andersson, Anders Löfgren |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 36% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,586
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,127
of 194,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.