| Title |
Inhibitory Constituents against Cyclooxygenases fromAralia cordata Thunb
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Pharmacal Research, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02975131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nguyen Hai Dang, XinFeng Zhang, MingShan Zheng, Kun Ho Son, Hyeun Wook Chang, Hyun Pyo Kim, KiHwan Bae, Sam Sik Kang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2008.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#371
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,330
of 140,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.