↓ Skip to main content

Success and failure of triptans

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Success and failure of triptans
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, June 2001
DOI 10.1007/s101940170040
Authors

Pramod R. Saxena, Peer Tfelt-Hansen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#600
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,014
of 41,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.