↓ Skip to main content

Problem Gambling and Intimate Partner Violence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Problem Gambling and Intimate Partner Violence
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10899-007-9077-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorne M. Korman, Jane Collins, Don Dutton, Bramilee Dhayananthan, Nina Littman-Sharp, Wayne Skinner

Abstract

This study examined the prevalence and severity of intimate partner violence (IPV) among 248 problem gamblers (43 women, 205 men) recruited from newspaper advertisements. The main outcome measures used were the Canadian Problem Gambling Index, the Conflicts Tactics Scale-2, the State Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2, the drug and alcohol section of the Addiction Severity Index and the substance use section of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV. In this sample, 62.9% of participants reported perpetrating and/or being the victims of IPV in the past year, with 25.4% reporting perpetrating severe IPV. The majority of the sample (64.5%) also had clinically significant anger problems, which was associated with an increased risk of being both the perpetrator and victim of IPV. The presence of a lifetime substance use disorder among participants who had clinically significant anger problems further increased the likelihood of both IPV perpetration and victimization. These findings underscore the importance of routinely screening gambling clients for anger and IPV, and the need to develop public policy, prevention and treatment programs to address IPV among problem gamblers. Future research to examine IPV among problem gamblers is recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 33%
Social Sciences 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,589,544
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#218
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,578
of 83,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them