| Title |
Conservation genomics reveals possible illegal trade routes and admixture across pangolin lineages in Southeast Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1080-9 |
| Authors |
Helen C. Nash, Wirdateti, Gabriel W. Low, Siew Woh Choo, Ju Lian Chong, Gono Semiadi, Ranjeev Hari, Muhammad Hafiz Sulaiman, Samuel T. Turvey, Theodore A. Evans, Frank E. Rheindt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 27% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,422,452
of 24,137,933 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#134
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,715
of 334,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.