| Title |
Dopamine- or L-DOPA-induced neurotoxicity: The role of dopamine quinone formation and tyrosinase in a model of Parkinson’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurotoxicity Research, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03033137 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masato Asanuma, Ikuko Miyazaki, Norio Ogawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 191 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 21% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2013.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurotoxicity Research
#286
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,604
of 140,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotoxicity Research
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.