| Title |
Biodiversity assessment based on cpDNA and crossability analysis in selected species of Allium subgenus Rhizirideum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, June 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-003-1335-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. W. D. van Raamsdonk, W. Ensink, A. W. van Heusden, M. Vrielink-van Ginkel, C. Kik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2009.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,366
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,247
of 49,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.