| Title |
Searching for potential microRNA-binding site mutations amongst known disease-associated 3′ UTR variants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The HUGO Journal, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11568-006-9000-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Chuzhanova, David N. Cooper, Claude Férec, Jian-Min Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2009.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The HUGO Journal
#14
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,007
of 172,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The HUGO Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them