↓ Skip to main content

Duplex-specific nuclease efficiently removes rRNA for prokaryotic RNA-seq

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duplex-specific nuclease efficiently removes rRNA for prokaryotic RNA-seq
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hana Yi, Yong-Joon Cho, Sungho Won, Jong-Eun Lee, Hyung Jin Yu, Sujin Kim, Gary P. Schroth, Shujun Luo, Jongsik Chun

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has great potential for application in bacterial transcriptomics. However, unlike eukaryotes, bacteria have no clear mechanism to select mRNAs over rRNAs; therefore, rRNA removal is a critical step in sequencing-based transcriptomics. Duplex-specific nuclease (DSN) is an enzyme that, at high temperatures, degrades duplex DNA in preference to single-stranded DNA. DSN treatment has been successfully used to normalize the relative transcript abundance in mRNA-enriched cDNA libraries from eukaryotic organisms. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of this method to remove rRNA from prokaryotic total RNA. We evaluated the efficacy of DSN to remove rRNA by comparing it with the conventional subtractive hybridization (Hyb) method. Illumina deep sequencing was performed to obtain transcriptomes from Escherichia coli grown under four growth conditions. The results clearly showed that our DSN treatment was more efficient at removing rRNA than the Hyb method was, while preserving the original relative abundance of mRNA species in bacterial cells. Therefore, we propose that, for bacterial mRNA-seq experiments, DSN treatment should be preferred to Hyb-based methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Italy 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Estonia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 224 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Student > Master 20 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 16%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 30 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,496,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#11,210
of 27,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,002
of 135,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#41
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.