| Title |
Preparation of carbon microparticle assemblies from phenolic resin using an inverse opal templating method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-007-1986-y |
| Authors |
Guoqing Guan, Katsuki Kusakabe, Haruka Ozono, Masatsugu Taneda, Masato Uehara, Hideaki Maeda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 21% |
| Engineering | 2 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#1,037
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,783
of 82,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#10
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.