| Title |
A SIMPLE METHOD FOR MASS PROPAGATION OF SPATHIPHYLLUM CANNIFOLIUM USING AN AIRLIFT BIOREACTOR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1079/ivp2006764 |
| Authors |
Y. H. DEWIR, D. CHAKRABARTY, E. J. HAHN, K. Y. PAEK |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2010.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant
#128
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,016
of 67,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.