| Title |
Pooled analyses of 13 prospective cohort studies on folate intake and colon cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-010-9620-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dong-Hyun Kim, Stephanie A. Smith-Warner, Donna Spiegelman, Shiaw-Shyuan Yaun, Graham A. Colditz, Jo L. Freudenheim, Edward Giovannucci, R. Alexandra Goldbohm, Saxon Graham, Lisa Harnack, Eric J. Jacobs, Michael Leitzmann, Satu Mannisto, Anthony B. Miller, John D. Potter, Thomas E. Rohan, Arthur Schatzkin, Frank E. Speizer, Victoria L. Stevens, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Paul Terry, Paolo Toniolo, Matty P. Weijenberg, Walter C. Willett, Alicja Wolk, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, David J. Hunter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,870,906
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#326
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,163
of 97,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.