↓ Skip to main content

Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Modelling of the toughening mechanisms in rubber-modified epoxy polymers
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00540702
Authors

Y. Huang, A. J. Kinloch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 35%
Materials Science 9 19%
Chemical Engineering 4 8%
Chemistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2010.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#941
of 4,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,608
of 62,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#17
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.