↓ Skip to main content

Sugarcane bagasse fiber and its cellulose nanocrystals for polymer reinforcement and heavy metal adsorbent: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Sugarcane bagasse fiber and its cellulose nanocrystals for polymer reinforcement and heavy metal adsorbent: a review
Published in
Cellulose, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10570-018-1879-z
Authors

R. Z. Khoo, W. S. Chow, H. Ismail

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 87 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 22 11%
Engineering 22 11%
Chemical Engineering 17 9%
Materials Science 11 6%
Unspecified 8 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 96 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,635,458
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#815
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,839
of 329,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.