↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative sodium imaging and gliomas: a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative sodium imaging and gliomas: a feasibility study
Published in
Neuroradiology, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00234-018-2041-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucidio P. Nunes Neto, Guillaume Madelin, Terlika Pandit Sood, Chih-Chun Wu, Douglas Kondziolka, Dimitris Placantonakis, John G. Golfinos, Andrew Chi, Rajan Jain

Abstract

Recent advances in sodium brain MRI have allowed for increased signal-to-noise ratio, faster imaging, and the ability of differentiating intracellular from extracellular sodium concentration, opening a new window of opportunity for clinical application. In gliomas, there are significant alterations in sodium metabolism, including increase in the total sodium concentration and extracellular volume fraction. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using sodium MRI quantitative measurements to evaluate gliomas. Eight patients with treatment-naïve gliomas were scanned at 3 T with a homemade 1H/23Na head coil, generating maps of pseudo-intracellular sodium concentration (C1), pseudo-extracellular volume fraction (α2), apparent intracellular sodium concentration (aISC), and apparent total sodium concentration (aTSC). Measurements were made within the contralateral normal-appearing putamen, contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and solid tumor regions (area of T2-FLAIR abnormality, excluding highly likely areas of edema, cysts, or necrosis). Paired samples t test were performed comparing NAWM and putamen and between NAWM and solid tumor. The normal-appearing putamen demonstrated significantly higher values for aTSC, aISC, C1 (p < 0.001), and α2 (p = 0.002) when compared to those of NAWM. The mean average of all solid tumors, when compared to that of NAWM, demonstrated significantly higher values of aTSC and α2 (p < 0.001), and significantly lower values of aISC (p = 0.02) for each patient. There was no significant difference between the values of C1 (p = 0.19). Quantitative sodium measurements can be done in glioma patients and also has provided further evidence that total sodium and extracellular volume fraction are increased in gliomas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,405,127
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#664
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,601
of 329,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.