| Title |
Influence of pollen feeding and physiological condition on pesticide sensitivity of the honey bee Apis mellifera carnica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, September 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00388082 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oscar Wahl, Kurt Ulm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 20% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,715,441
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#719
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,076
of 60,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.