You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization.. Algorithms and Techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/b11961 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-040770-6, 978-3-54-045198-3
|
| Authors |
Sanjeev Arora, Klaus Jansen, José D. P. Rolim, Amit Sahai |
| Editors |
Arora, Sanjeev, Jansen, Klaus, Rolim, José D. P., Sahai, Amit |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,782,038
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#888
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,968
of 129,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#19
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.