↓ Skip to main content

A unified masking approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
A unified masking approach
Published in
Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13389-018-0184-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannes Gross, Stefan Mangard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 59%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,635,458
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#53
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,551
of 333,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.