| Title |
Conservation Management of Tasmanian Devils in the Context of an Emerging, Extinction-threatening Disease: Devil Facial Tumor Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-007-0120-6 |
| Authors |
Menna E. Jones, Peter J. Jarman, Caroline M. Lees, Heather Hesterman, Rodrigo K. Hamede, Nick J. Mooney, Dydee Mann, Chrissy E. Pukk, Jemma Bergfeld, Hamish McCallum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Researcher | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,237,864
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#73
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,269
of 70,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.