↓ Skip to main content

Experimental assessment of a new mechanical endoscopic solosurgery system: Endofreeze

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Experimental assessment of a new mechanical endoscopic solosurgery system: Endofreeze
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00464-003-9132-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Arezzo, M. O. Schurr, A. Braun, G. F. Buess

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Unspecified 3 17%
Engineering 3 17%
Design 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,707
of 6,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,884
of 59,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.