| Title |
An Antarctic Hot Spot for Fungi at Shackleton's Historic Hut on Cape Royds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbial Ecology, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00248-010-9664-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert A. Blanchette, Benjamin W. Held, Brett E. Arenz, Joel A. Jurgens, Nicolas J. Baltes, Shona M. Duncan, Roberta L. Farrell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2010.
All research outputs
#3,726,631
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#371
of 2,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,090
of 95,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.