↓ Skip to main content

A novel compound heterozygous mutation in a Chinese boy with L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria: a case study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A novel compound heterozygous mutation in a Chinese boy with L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria: a case study
Published in
BMC Neurology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0369-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongfei Tai, Zaiqiang Zhang

Abstract

L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria is a rare autosomal recessive encephalopathy caused by mutations in the L-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase gene. We describe some novel clinical and molecular characteristics found in a boy with L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria. We report an 8-year-old Chinese boy, who had characteristic developmental delay, ataxia and acrocephaly as the main symptoms. He also complained of paroxysmal headache and palpitation. Brain image revealed a symmetrical, extensive subcortical white matter lesion. Urine test for organic acids showed a significantly increased level of 2-hydroxyglutaric acid (106.74 mmol/mol cre, normal range 0.6 ~ 5.9 mmol/mol cre), leading to the diagnosis of L-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria. Genetic testing uncovered two heterozygous missense mutations in L-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase gene: c.169G > A in exon 2 and c.542G > T in exon 5, not hitherto been described. Novel gene mutation and associated clinical symptoms can contribute for the understanding and identification of this rare disease. Possible genotype-phenotype correlation waits for further study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Psychology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,231,810
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,220
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,330
of 263,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#28
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.