Title |
Protease and ROS activities influenced by a composite of bacterial cellulose and collagen type I in vitro
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cellulose, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10570-006-9073-0 |
Authors |
Cornelia Wiegand, Peter Elsner, Uta-Christina Hipler, Dieter Klemm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 62 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 14 | 22% |
Materials Science | 10 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#252
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,006
of 66,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.