↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS): A literature-based assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 123)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS): A literature-based assessment
Published in
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11884-009-0005-3
Authors

Scott A. MacDiarmid, David R. Staskin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2011.
All research outputs
#4,773,469
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
#12
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,171
of 93,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them