↓ Skip to main content

Polypeptide Conjugate Binders that Discriminate between Two Isoforms of Human Carbonic Anhydrase in Human Blood

Overview of attention for article published in ChemBioChem, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polypeptide Conjugate Binders that Discriminate between Two Isoforms of Human Carbonic Anhydrase in Human Blood
Published in
ChemBioChem, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/cbic.201000556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lotta T. Tegler, Karin Fromell, Bengt‐Harald Jonsson, Johan Viljanen, Cecilia Winander, Jonas Carlsson, Lars Baltzer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,211,309
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from ChemBioChem
#2,096
of 5,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,753
of 192,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemBioChem
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,925 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.