↓ Skip to main content

Functional characterization of biallelic RTTN variants identified in an infant with microcephaly, simplified gyral pattern, pontocerebellar hypoplasia, and seizures

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional characterization of biallelic RTTN variants identified in an infant with microcephaly, simplified gyral pattern, pontocerebellar hypoplasia, and seizures
Published in
Pediatric Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41390-018-0083-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. Wambach, Daniel J. Wegner, Ping Yang, Marwan Shinawi, Dustin Baldridge, Ewelina Betleja, Joshua S. Shimony, David Spencer, Brian P. Hackett, Marisa V. Andrews, Thomas Ferkol, Susan K. Dutcher, Moe R. Mahjoub, F. Sessions Cole

Abstract

Biallelic deleterious variants in RTTN, which encodes rotatin, are associated with primary microcephaly, polymicrogyria, seizures, intellectual disability, and primordial dwarfism in human infants. We performed exome sequencing of an infant with primary microcephaly, pontocerebellar hypoplasia, and intractable seizures and his healthy, unrelated parents. We cultured the infant's fibroblasts to determine primary ciliary phenotype. We identified biallelic variants in RTTN in the affected infant: a novel missense variant and a rare, intronic variant that results in aberrant transcript splicing. Cultured fibroblasts from the infant demonstrated reduced length and number of primary cilia. Biallelic variants in RTTN cause primary microcephaly in infants. Functional characterization of primary cilia length and number can be used to determine pathogenicity of RTTN variants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,038,949
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#3,062
of 5,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,025
of 329,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#58
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.