↓ Skip to main content

Breast cancer risk and night shift work in a case–control study in a Spanish population

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Breast cancer risk and night shift work in a case–control study in a Spanish population
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10654-015-0073-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyriaki Papantoniou, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Ana Espinosa, Nuria Aragonés, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Eva Ardanaz, Jone Miren Altzibar, Vicente Martin Sanchez, Inés Gómez-Acebo, Javier Llorca, David Muñoz, Adonina Tardón, Rosana Peiró, Rafael Marcos-Gragera, Marina Pollan, Manolis Kogevinas

Abstract

Epidemiologic and animal data indicate that night shift work might increase the risk for breast cancer. We evaluated the association of night work with different clinical types of breast cancer in a population based case-control study (MCC-Spain study) taking into account chronotype, an individual characteristic that may relate to night shift work adaptation. Lifetime occupational history was assessed by face-to-face interviews and shift work information was available for 1708 breast cancer cases and 1778 population controls from 10 Spanish regions, enrolled from 2008 to 2013. We evaluated three shift work domains, including shift work type (permanent vs rotating), lifetime cumulative duration and frequency. We estimated odds ratios (OR) for night work compared to day work using unconditional logistic regression models adjusting for confounders. Having ever worked permanent or rotating night shift was associated with an increased risk for breast cancer compared to day workers [odds ratio (OR) 1.18; 95 % CI 0.97, 1.43]. Chronotype was differentially associated with breast cancer depending on the duration of night shift work. Risk was higher in women with invasive tumors (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.51) and for estrogen and progestagen positive tumors among premenopausal women (OR 1.44; 95 % CI 1.05, 1.99). Having ever performed night shift was associated with a small increased risk for breast cancer and especially in subgroups of women with particular hormone related characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,340,815
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,321
of 1,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,897
of 263,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.