| Title |
A Comparison of the Pulmonary Bioavailability of Powder and Liquid Aerosol Formulations of Salmon Calcitonin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-008-9547-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Clark, Mei-chang Kuo, Stephen Newman, Peter Hirst, Gary Pitcairn, Matt Pickford |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 42% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 29% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,024
of 2,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,808
of 80,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.