↓ Skip to main content

Serrated tubulovillous adenoma of the large intestine

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serrated tubulovillous adenoma of the large intestine
Published in
Histopathology, September 2015
DOI 10.1111/his.12788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Bettington, Neal Walker, Christophe Rosty, Ian Brown, Andrew Clouston, Diane McKeone, Sally-Ann Pearson, Kerenaftali Klein, Barbara Leggett, Vicki Whitehall

Abstract

Most colorectal polyps are readily classified, but a subset of tubulovillous adenomas (TVA) with prominent serrated architecture cause diagnostic confusion. We aimed to 1) identify histological features that separate serrated TVAs from both conventional TVAs and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) and 2) perform a clinicopathological and molecular analysis to determine if the serrated TVA has unique features. We collected 48 serrated TVAs, 50 conventional TVAs and 66 BRAF wild-type TSAs for analysis. For each polyp we performed a clinicopathological assessment, BRAF and KRAS mutation profiling, CpG island methylator phenotype status, MGMT methylation and immunohistochemical assessment of seven markers (MLH1, p16, p53, β-catenin, Ki67, CK7 and CK20). We found that serrated TVAs can be reliably diagnosed and have features distinct from both conventional TVAs and TSAs. Compared to conventional TVAs, serrated TVAs are larger, more often proximal, more histologically advanced, show more CpG island methylation and more frequent KRAS mutation. Compared to TSAs, they are more often proximal, show less CpG island methylation, more frequent MGMT methylation and more frequent nuclear staining for β-catenin. The serrated TVA can be reliably diagnosed and has unique features. It represents a precursor of KRAS mutated, microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Other 5 9%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 23 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,107,285
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#297
of 3,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,968
of 277,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.