↓ Skip to main content

Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
918 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1523 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-9-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob D Durrant, J Andrew McCammon

Abstract

This review discusses the many roles atomistic computer simulations of macromolecular (for example, protein) receptors and their associated small-molecule ligands can play in drug discovery, including the identification of cryptic or allosteric binding sites, the enhancement of traditional virtual-screening methodologies, and the direct prediction of small-molecule binding energies. The limitations of current simulation methodologies, including the high computational costs and approximations of molecular forces required, are also discussed. With constant improvements in both computer power and algorithm design, the future of computer-aided drug design is promising; molecular dynamics simulations are likely to play an increasingly important role.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Other 20 1%
Unknown 1455 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 359 24%
Student > Master 204 13%
Student > Bachelor 189 12%
Researcher 170 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 76 5%
Other 175 11%
Unknown 350 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 336 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 229 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 218 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 76 5%
Engineering 58 4%
Other 200 13%
Unknown 406 27%