↓ Skip to main content

Leisure Activity Enjoyment of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Leisure Activity Enjoyment of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2529-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan Eversole, Diane M. Collins, Amol Karmarkar, Lisa Colton, Jill Phillips Quinn, Rita Karsbaek, Jessica Reinken Johnson, Nicolle Patricia Callier, Claudia L. Hilton

Abstract

Enjoyment is a fundamental component of activity participation. This study compared leisure activity enjoyment experienced by typically developing children (TD; n = 64) and those with autism spectrum disorders (ASD; n = 67) from age 6 to 13. The TD children enjoyed formal and physical activities significantly more than the children with ASD. Symptom severity was negatively related to enjoyment of overall, formal, physical and social activities. Older children with ASD enjoyed overall, informal, recreational, and self-improvement activities significantly less than younger children, but no differences were seen across TD age groups. Children with ASD enjoyed swimming significantly more than TD children. Understanding patterns of activity enjoyment is useful for being better able to address a child's motivation to participate in various life activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 16%
Sports and Recreations 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,862,762
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#764
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,991
of 275,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#17
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.