You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Good at Heart: Preserving Cardiac Metabolism during aging.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Diabetes Reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2174/1573399811666150722124958 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Sorriento, Antonietta Franco, Maria Rosaria Rusciano, Angela Serena Maione, Maria Soprano, Maddalena Illario, Guido Iaccarino, Michele Ciccarelli |
| Abstract |
The natural process of aging determinates several cardiac modifications with increased susceptibility to heart diseases and ultimately converging on development of chronic heart failure as final stage. These changes mainly include left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, valvular degeneration, increased cardiac fibrosis, increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation, and decreased maximal exercise capacity, as demonstrated in several humans and animal models of aging. While different theories have been proposed to explain the natural process of aging, it is clear that most of the alterations affect mechanisms involved in cell homeostasis and maintenance. Latest research studies have in particular focused on role of mitochondrial oxidative stress, energy production and mitochondria quality control. This article reviews the central role played by this organelle in aging and the role of new molecular players involved into the progression toward heart failure and potentially susceptible of new "anti-aging" strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2015.
All research outputs
#19,947,956
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reviews
#275
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,352
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reviews
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.