| Title |
Role of hydroxycinnamic acids in food flavor: a brief overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-009-9159-z |
| Authors |
Deshou Jiang, Devin G. Peterson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 27 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#147
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,003
of 166,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.