↓ Skip to main content

Emergence times and airway reactions in general laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Emergence times and airway reactions in general laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0855-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Stevanovic, Rolf Rossaint, András P. Keszei, Harald Fritz, Gebhard Fröba, Friedrich Pühringer, Mark Coburn

Abstract

The use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in appropriate patients supports fast-track anesthesia with a lower incidence of postoperative airway-connected adverse events. Data on the most favorable anesthetic in this context, with the lowest rate of upper airway complications and fast emergence times, are controversial and limited. Desflurane seems to match these criteria best, but large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a standardized study protocol are lacking. Therefore, we aim to compare desflurane with other commonly used anesthetics, sevoflurane and propofol, in a sufficiently powered RCT. We hypothesize that desflurane is noninferior regarding the frequency of upper airway events and superior regarding the emergence times to sevoflurane and propofol. A total of 351 patients undergoing surgery with an LMA will be included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled, multicenter clinical trial. The patients will be randomly assigned to the three treatment arms: desflurane (n = 117), sevoflurane (n = 117), and propofol (n = 117). The emergence time (time to state the date of birth) will be the primary endpoint of this study. The secondary endpoints include further emergence times, such as time to open eyes, to remove LMA, to respond to command and to state name. Additionally, we will determine the frequency of cough and laryngospasm, measured intraoperatively and at emergence. We will assess the postoperative recovery on the first postoperative day via the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale. Despite increasing importance of cost-effective and safe anesthesia application, we lack proof for the most advantageous anesthetic agent, when an LMA is used. There are only a few RCTs comparing desflurane to other commonly used anesthetics (sevoflurane, propofol and isoflurane) in patients with LMA. These RCTs were conducted with small sample sizes, huge interstudy variability, and some also showed strong biases. The present multicenter RCT will provide results from a large sample size with a standardized study protocol and minimized bias, which is feasible in the clinical routine. Furthermore, we will expand our knowledge regarding the most favorable recovery on the first postoperative day, which impacts patients' comfort after surgery. EudraCT Identifier: 2014-003810-96, 5 September 2014 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02322502 , December 2014.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Other 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%