| Title |
An improvement of discrete Tardos fingerprinting codes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Designs, Codes and Cryptography, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10623-009-9285-z |
| Authors |
Koji Nuida, Satoshi Fujitsu, Manabu Hagiwara, Takashi Kitagawa, Hajime Watanabe, Kazuto Ogawa, Hideki Imai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 18 | 60% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#44
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,144
of 95,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Designs, Codes and Cryptography
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them