| Title |
Creation of macroporous calcium phosphate cements as bone substitutes by using genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-008-3654-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meng Li, Xingyan Liu, Xudong Liu, Baofeng Ge, Keming Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 22% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 7 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
| Engineering | 5 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2012.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,000
of 167,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.