↓ Skip to main content

Enterovirus D68 disease and molecular epidemiology in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Virology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enterovirus D68 disease and molecular epidemiology in Australia
Published in
Journal of Clinical Virology, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.06.079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avram Levy, Jason Roberts, Jurissa Lang, Simone Tempone, Alison Kesson, Alfred Dofai, Andrew J. Daley, Bruce Thorley, David J. Speers

Abstract

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) has received considerable recent attention as a cause of widespread respiratory illness. Neurological syndromes such as acute flaccid paralysis following EV-D68 infection have also been reported in a small number of cases. To summarize the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of laboratory confirmed EV-D68 cases in Australia. We combined EV-D68 data acquired through laboratory surveillance in Western Australia with cases from national enterovirus surveillance and regional acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance. Clinical data was obtained for EV-D68 cases and capsid protein sequences were used for phylogenetic analysis. Sporadic cases of EV-D68 were recorded in Australia since 2008, with peaks in activity during 2011 and 2013. EV-D68 was primarily associated with respiratory disease, but was also detected in cerebrospinal fluid of one patient and faeces of two patients presenting with AFP. EV-D68 has been circulating in Western Australia and is likely to have also been present in the wider region for a number of years, causing primarily respiratory disease. Detection of EV-D68 in cerebrospinal fluid of one patient and in faeces of two AFP cases reinforces the association between EV-D68 and neurological disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Virology
#1,662
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,539
of 277,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Virology
#31
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.