| Title |
Crocheting the hyperbolic plane
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Mathematical Intelligencer, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03026623 |
| Authors |
David W. Henderson, Daina Taimina |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 40% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 17% |
| Design | 4 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 26% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#88
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,469
of 184,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Mathematical Intelligencer
#17
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.