| Title |
A self-contained fully-enclosed microfluidic cartridge for lab on a chip
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-009-9347-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Levent Yobas, Lih Feng Cheow, Kum-Cheong Tang, Shien-Eit Yong, Eleana Kye-Zheng Ong, Lionel Wong, William Cheng-Yong Teo, Hongmiao Ji, Siti Rafeah, Chen Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 56% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#238
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,167
of 93,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.