↓ Skip to main content

‘Singing with your baby’: an evaluation of group singing sessions for women admitted to a specialist mother-baby unit

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
‘Singing with your baby’: an evaluation of group singing sessions for women admitted to a specialist mother-baby unit
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00737-018-0859-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Reilly, Gemma Turner, Jamilie Taouk, Marie-Paule Austin

Abstract

This paper reports on the acceptability, experience of participation and the immediate impact on maternal mood state of group singing sessions, introduced as a routine component of a mother-baby unit (MBU) treatment programme. Data was collected from 27 women who participated in the pilot programme. Results showed that implementation of a singing intervention in this setting is positively appraised by women and is associated with positive changes in self-reported mood state from pre- to post-session. Key facilitators and barriers to the success of the programme and directions for future research are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 33 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 17%
Arts and Humanities 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,613,205
of 24,475,473 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#456
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,677
of 335,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,475,473 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.