↓ Skip to main content

Discussion arising from the 1st Hans Cloos Lecture, by John Knill

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 227)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Discussion arising from the 1st Hans Cloos Lecture, by John Knill
Published in
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10064-003-0217-2
Authors

Fred Baynes, Mike Rosenbaum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 60%
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 120%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
#41
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,007
of 144,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them