↓ Skip to main content

Surgical complications of urinary diversion

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Urology, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Surgical complications of urinary diversion
Published in
World Journal of Urology, August 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00345-004-0429-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott B. Farnham, Michael S. Cookson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Other 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#866
of 2,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,153
of 58,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.