| Title |
Noninvasive Detection of Thin-Liquid Aspiration Using Dual-Axis Swallowing Accelerometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-012-9418-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catriona M. Steele, Ervin Sejdić, Tom Chau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Engineering | 13 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#651
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,089
of 182,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.