↓ Skip to main content

Cryptic speciation in the Acari: a function of species lifestyles or our ability to separate species?

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental and Applied Acarology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Cryptic speciation in the Acari: a function of species lifestyles or our ability to separate species?
Published in
Experimental and Applied Acarology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10493-015-9954-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Skoracka, Sara Magalhães, Brian G. Rector, Lechosław Kuczyński

Abstract

There are approximately 55,000 described Acari species, accounting for almost half of all known Arachnida species, but total estimated Acari diversity is reckoned to be far greater. One important source of currently hidden Acari diversity is cryptic speciation, which poses challenges to taxonomists documenting biodiversity assessment as well as to researchers in medicine and agriculture. In this review, we revisit the subject of biodiversity in the Acari and investigate what is currently known about cryptic species within this group. Based on a thorough literature search, we show that the probability of occurrence of cryptic species is mainly related to the number of attempts made to detect them. The use of, both, DNA tools and bioassays significantly increased the probability of cryptic species detection. We did not confirm the generally-accepted idea that species lifestyle (i.e. free-living vs. symbiotic) affects the number of cryptic species. To increase detection of cryptic lineages and to understand the processes leading to cryptic speciation in Acari, integrative approaches including multivariate morphometrics, molecular tools, crossing, ecological assays, intensive sampling, and experimental evolution are recommended. We conclude that there is a demonstrable need for future investigations focusing on potentially hidden mite and tick species and addressing evolutionary mechanisms behind cryptic speciation within Acari.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,572,005
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#552
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,169
of 265,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.