| Title |
The Effects of a Shared Reading Intervention on Narrative Story Comprehension and Task Engagement of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-018-3633-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
So Yeon Kim, Mandy Rispoli, Catharine Lory, Emily Gregori, Matthew T. Brodhead |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a shared reading intervention on narrative story comprehension and task engagement of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A single-case multiple baseline design was used, and three elementary-aged students with ASD participated in this study. The shared reading intervention included before, during, and after reading strategies (i.e., topic anticipation, dynamic reading, story retelling). Results of this study indicated that all participants demonstrated noticeable improvements in reading comprehension. Despite the longer duration of intervention sessions as compared to baseline sessions, participants showed similar or better task engagement with intervention. Improved reading outcomes were maintained at follow up for all participants. Implications for practical implementation and future research were discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 57 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,629,788
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,441
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,097
of 333,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#54
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.