↓ Skip to main content

Macrophage polarization in pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
499 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
535 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Macrophage polarization in pathology
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00018-015-1995-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Sica, Marco Erreni, Paola Allavena, Chiara Porta

Abstract

Macrophages are cells of the innate immunity constituting the mononuclear phagocyte system and endowed with remarkable different roles essential for defense mechanisms, development of tissues, and homeostasis. They derive from hematopoietic precursors and since the early steps of fetal life populate peripheral tissues, a process continuing throughout adult life. Although present essentially in every organ/tissue, macrophages are more abundant in the gastro-intestinal tract, liver, spleen, upper airways, and brain. They have phagocytic and bactericidal activity and produce inflammatory cytokines that are important to drive adaptive immune responses. Macrophage functions are settled in response to microenvironmental signals, which drive the acquisition of polarized programs, whose extremes are simplified in the M1 and M2 dichotomy. Functional skewing of monocyte/macrophage polarization occurs in physiological conditions (e.g., ontogenesis and pregnancy), as well as in pathology (allergic and chronic inflammation, tissue repair, infection, and cancer) and is now considered a key determinant of disease development and/or regression. Here, we will review evidence supporting a dynamic skewing of macrophage functions in disease, which may provide a basis for macrophage-centered therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 528 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 18%
Student > Master 78 15%
Researcher 57 11%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 77 14%
Unknown 142 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 91 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 74 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 12%
Engineering 13 2%
Other 60 11%
Unknown 161 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,562,435
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,386
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,460
of 264,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#18
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.