↓ Skip to main content

The effects of microtubule and microfilament disrupting agents on cytoskeletal arrays and wall deposition in developing cotton fibers

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, February 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
The effects of microtubule and microfilament disrupting agents on cytoskeletal arrays and wall deposition in developing cotton fibers
Published in
Protoplasma, February 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01326634
Authors

R. W. Seagull

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,570,428
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#136
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,604
of 58,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them