You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Archaic lineages broaden our view on the history of Arabidopsis thaliana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.15244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Fulgione, Angela M. Hancock |
| Abstract |
Contents I. II. III. IV. V. References SUMMARY: Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana has contributed to discoveries in diverse areas of plant biology. While A. thaliana has typically been considered a weed associated primarily with human-mediated environments, including agricultural and urban sites and railways, it has recently been shown that it is also native in remote natural areas, including high altitude sites in Eurasia and Africa, from the Atlas mountains in Morocco to the afro-alpine regions in Eastern and South Africa to Yunnan in China, the Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau. This finding suggests that while A. thaliana has been extensively studied in Europe and Western Asia there are still many open questions about its population history, genotype-phenotype relationships and mechanisms of adaptation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 22% |
| Germany | 8 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Georgia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 56% |
| Scientists | 22 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,054,524
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#757
of 9,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,544
of 343,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#18
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.