You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A genome-wide meta-analysis of genetic variants associated with allergic rhinitis and grass sensitization and their interaction with birth order
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.08.030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adaikalavan Ramasamy, Ivan Curjuric, Lachlan J. Coin, Ashish Kumar, Wendy L. McArdle, Medea Imboden, Benedicte Leynaert, Manolis Kogevinas, Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier, Juha Pekkanen, Matthias Wjst, Andreas J. Bircher, Ulla Sovio, Thierry Rochat, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen, David J. Balding, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Nicole Probst-Hensch, David P. Strachan, Deborah L. Jarvis |
| Abstract |
Hay fever or seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic disorder associated with IgE sensitization to grass. The underlying genetic variants have not been studied comprehensively. There is overwhelming evidence that those who have older siblings have less AR, although the mechanism for this remains unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,464,470
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#2,077
of 11,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,561
of 154,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#14
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.